- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:08:02 -0700
- To: "www-forms@w3.org" <www-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFDFDA8E66.94C2E466-ON88257574.007EB6E6-88257574.007F032D@ca.ibm.com>
The Forms working group had its face to face meeting at Google the week of Feb. 9, as well as a virtual face-to-face day on Feb. 5. Much of the group work recently has been devoted to ironing out deficiencies in the substantial test suite for XForms 1.1, an exercise that is in parallel with implementers' preparation of their full implementation reports for XForms 1.1. The test suite contains over 400 tests, and as of Feb. 17 we have 7 tests requiring two more passing implementations and 53 tests requiring one more passing implementation [1]. Implementers are actively working to complete implementations of these few remaining features, after which the working group will be able to request advancement of XForms 1.1 to PR. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2009Feb/0049.html At the end of 2008, the working group published "XForms for HTML". As this this recommendation track document provides attributes and script methods intended for use in HTML, including HTML5, it is important to get review and feedback from the HTML WG. The working group has put effort into modularization of XForms, to decouple the various components for independent use. However, the working group now feels that the modularization of the markup modules is not the right approach to take and instead wants to first consider how the AJAX programmer community could benefit from XForms capabilities, then determine what APIs do those considerations warrant, and then determine what component bundlings of XForms are needed to support those APIs. Meanwhile, the working group continues to focus further development of XForms 1.2 on just those features needed to support XForms for HTML plus further incremental refinements that have shown themselves to be needed over the years of ongoing XForms 1.1 adoption. Cheers, John Boyer for the W3C Forms Working Group
Received on Monday, 9 March 2009 23:07:57 UTC