- From: Mats Eklund <mats.eklund@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 04:07:48 -0800 (PST)
- To: Joern Turner <joernturner@me.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <238923.60751.qm@web59002.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
submission then load is how I currently do it, however, this requires the server to be tweaked to respond with a redirect in a non-conventional way. By conventional I'm referring to the "PRG pattern" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post/Redirect/Get). As long as this pattern isn't used, there is no problem. Maybe xforms was not intended to be used with this pattern...? --- On Fri, 12/4/09, Joern Turner <joernturner@me.com> wrote: From: Joern Turner <joernturner@me.com> Subject: Re: Javascript implementation limitation To: "Mats Eklund" <mats.eklund@yahoo.com> Cc: www-forms@w3.org Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 10:00 AM Mats, On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:21 PM, Mats Eklund wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm weighing pros and cons of two xforms implementations, one is a server side implementation and the other is a browser side implementation in javascript. It appears to me that one inherent limitation of a javascript implementation is that xforms submissions with replace="all" is impossible to achieve. Any insights welcome? > That's not right. In Chiba we support submission/@replace="all". Though it comes to the price of having an additional URI param on the resulting URL. On the other hand you can always substitute a replace all with a combination of submission and load. Regards, Joern > > Thanks, > > Mats > >
Received on Friday, 4 December 2009 12:08:29 UTC