- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:54:03 -0500
- To: Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF4D89B6D7.C588135E-ON852573E7.00205A59-852573E7.002071CC@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Aaron, I adjusted the editor's draft spec to clarify here: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#structure-bind-element Please have a look and let us know if you would like any further changes. Thank you, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org 02/04/2008 02:33 PM To www-forms@w3.org cc Subject Re: What to do with outer xf:bind with no @nodeset Fixing the spec is all I ask. I have no problem with how it works. But it is tough when a user has a question and I have to answer, "I used logic and the process of elimination to figure out your answer...trust me". I'd much rather say, "look at the description for @nodeset in the bind element section." The spec is all we got for XForms 1.1 until someone decides to write a book. I think we have to make things as direct and human readable as possible if we want to encourage adoption. --Aaron John Boyer wrote: > > Hi Aaron, > > I did have a feeling you would point that out. To be fair to your > point, I did take note of the fact that the spec did not come out and > say that the MIPs attach to the context node. But in fairness to > everyone else who was satisfied with the current amount of specificity, > there isn't a terribly obvious alternative for where to attach the MIP > when the nodset is optional other than attaching the MIP to the context > node for the MIP expression, which is how it works when the nodeset is > required (granted because the context node is the same as the node > indicated by the nodeset). Put another way, why should it behave > differently and choose a different node because one says: > > <bind nodeset="x"> > <bind calculate="y"/> > </bind> > > rather than > > <bind nodeset="x" calculate="y"/> > > Still, we can put it on the list of edits for 1.1 going to PR. Will > that suffice? > > Thanks, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > Senior Technical Staff Member > Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > > > > *Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com>* > Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org > > 02/01/2008 01:13 PM > > > To > www-forms@w3.org > cc > > Subject > Re: What to do with outer xf:bind with no @nodeset > > > > > > > > > > Yep, I had seen that section, which clearly defines what the evaluation > context node should be for the expressions contained in the MIP > attributes. But I don't see it say anywhere that the MIP's are then > applied to the evaluation context node. Nor does it say that anywhere > in the xf:bind section. > > And to be what I'm sure is over critical, I don't think that a user > should have to look in the evaluation context section and read through > that whole section to know what node(s) the MIPs are being applied to. > I would expect it to be spelled out in the bind section. Something like, > > nodeset > > An optional attribute containing a model binding expression that > selects the set of nodes on which this bind operates. If the nodeset > attribute is not present, then the bind operates on the evaluation > context nodes of the bind element. > > Then, if the user doesn't know what the evaluation context nodes are, > they can read further on that subject. > > I might be nitpicking, but it certainly isn't clear to me where the > MIP's are applied. > > Also, could someone verify what should happen if my @nodeset points to a > node with complex content? For example, the root node that has 3 child > elements underneath it? Should the result of @calculate wipe out the > child elements or should the result of @calculate be stored as the first > child node (a child text node) of the bound node and leave the child > elements alone? > > --Aaron > > John Boyer wrote: > > > > > > The definition of the bind element appears here: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/#structure-bind-element > > > > It ends with the statement that the evaluation context for the MIP > > attributes is obtained here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/#expr-eval > > > > Wherein the following relevant paragraph appears: > > > > XPath expressions also appear in model item property attributes of the > > bind element to define computed expressions. If the bind element does > > not express a Node Set binding, then the in-scope evaluation context for > > model item property attributes of the bind is equal to the in-scope > > evaluation context for the bind. Otherwise, the bind has a Node Set > > binding, and computed expressions for each model item property attribute > > are generated for each node. For each computed expression generated, the > > evaluation context node, position and size are determined by the same > > method as dynamic in-scope evaluation context rule above, except the > > computed expression is used in lieu of a binding expression attribute > > such that the bind element is the nearest ancestor binding element. > > > > The reference to the expression evaluation section was added in Erratum > > E23: http://www.w3.org/2006/03/REC-xforms-20060314-errata.html#E23 > > > > That erratum also notes that it is dependent on the wording added by > > erratum E17.3: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/03/REC-xforms-20060314-errata.html#E17c > > > > which is what included the above paragraph (see the diff-marked version > > > http://www.w3.org/2006/03/REC-xforms-20060314-errata-diff-20070719.html#E17c ).. > > > > > > > Cheers, > > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > > Senior Technical Staff Member > > Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher > > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > > IBM Victoria Software Lab > > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com > > > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > > Blog RSS feed: > > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > > > > > > > > > *Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>* > > Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org > > > > 01/31/2008 08:32 PM > > > > > > To > > www-forms@w3.org > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: What to do with outer xf:bind with no @nodeset > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Orbeon sandbox can't even load the form > > > > Yup we require the @nodeset attribute on xforms:bind. I had not > > realized that the @nodeset attribute had become optional and I am > > interested in the answer too! > > > > -Erik > > > > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > > <!-- basic FO page definition stuff --> > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > > xmlns:xforms="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms > > > " > > > xmlns:ev="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events" > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > > > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > > > > <head> > > > <title>binding testcase</title> > > > <xforms:model> > > > <xforms:instance xmlns=""> > > > <values> > > > <value>27</value> > > > </values> > > > </xforms:instance> > > > <xforms:bind id="binddata" > > > calculate="now()"/> > > > <xforms:submission id="submitInfo" > > > method="post" > > > action="http://www.xformstest.org/cgi-bin/echo.sh" /> > > > </xforms:model> > > > </head> > > > <body> > > > <h2>I think that the submission should show the current date and > > > time along with the value node and its value. > > > </h2> > > > <h3>Uses now() and bind w/o nodeset attribute</h3><br/> > > > <xforms:submit submission="submitInfo"> > > > <xforms:label>Echo instance data</xforms:label> > > > </xforms:submit> > > > </body> > > > </html> > > > > > > Any help appreciated. Thanks, > > > --Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way > > http://www.orbeon.com/ > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 05:54:37 UTC