- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 07:56:27 -0600
- To: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>, www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-request@w3.org
On 1 Jun 2007, at 14:55 , Charles F Wiecha wrote: > FF 2.0.0.4 has, I believe, broken the XForms extension (at least it > has > also done so for me), so I've reverted to 2.0.0.3. > > In XForms 1.0 <switch> was not allowed within <repeat> due to concerns > about the resulting duplication of IDs that would result. In > XForms 1.1 > this has been addressed -- see section 4.7 of the working draft at > http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#idref-resolve. > > As you observe, however, some implementations of XForms 1.0 do > nonetheless > support this. You should be fine going back to the earlier FF > extension. Thank you, both for the information about switch and repeat and for confirming that my problems with FF 2.0.0.4 are not my imagination. Michael Sperberg-McQueen
Received on Saturday, 2 June 2007 13:56:35 UTC