- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:00:59 +0000
- To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>, www-forms@w3.org, WHAT WG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Klotz, Leigh wrote: > If Opera had wanted to engage, it would have done so in the many > previous years, and if Opera had concerns about the direction of XForms > (or even XHTML (or even XML)) it would have done so at the charter and > requirements document stages. Not doing so was a business decision, and > I can't argue with that. But please don't confuse those business > decisions with technical objections, of which there were none expressed. Sorry, was I reading the same document as you? I saw a list of technical problems that Apple and Opera identified... -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 18:01:49 UTC