- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 22:00:43 +0000
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Hi Aaron, > I think what Lee is saying is that he is doing a submission that will > replace the first instance. And that the act of this replacement of the > first instance will affect instance nodes in a second instance document > (I assume through recalculate or xforms-value-changed handlers?). So he > wants to be sure that all of that is done before he goes ahead and > submits the second instance document. So not as simple as just waiting > for xforms-submit-done, is it? It might actually work in some > processors due to the nature of single threading, but it isn't > guaranteed to work, is it? Yes...I agree that this is probably what Lee is saying. (Lee? Is this right?) But I think the second submission should not take place until the first is complete. You are right that some processors are asynchronous and some synchronous (and there is a new flag in XForms 1.1 to allow authors to make explicit how a particular submission should behave), but you should only receive "xforms-submit-done" once the submission has fully completed. Whether that action handler runs in a new thread or not shouldn't make any difference to the fact that by the time this handler _is_ run, the instance should have been updated. Ah...hang on though...I've just had one thought...if there are calculations involved (bind statements using @calculate) then a rebuild might be needed. Perhaps that's the problem that Lee is having--perhaps his second submission *is* correctly taking place after the first, but because of the way deferred update works, it may be that his second instance is not being updated with the data from the returned first instance until both submissions are complete, and so he never sees it. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Tuesday, 31 October 2006 22:00:57 UTC