- From: Jason <jeacott@hardlight.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:54:28 +1030
- To: www-forms <www-forms@w3.org>
Hi all, Today I decided it was time to upgrade the version of chiba I've been using for my xforms only to find that its behaviour has changed. I checked a few other implementations and they all seem to agree on this point, so I'm totally confused. up until now I've been using a trigger with something like: <xforms:insert bind="bind_1" at="index('repeat_1')" position="after"/> in order to allow form users to add items to lists. BUT if they remove all the items from the list then this no longer works and I apparently need a completely different button to get the first item on the list again. Is this true? My existing copy of chiba just inserts, even if there are currently no items in the list. how is this supposed to work? how have people built real life forms to cope with this odd behaviour(imho) I've had another look at the w3c position for xforms 1.0 and it seems to suggest that this behaviour is designed (unless the "homogeneous collection" is actually meant to mean the collection that exists at form startup including any implied nodes from binding lazily? ) ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/slice9.html#action-insert The homogeneous collection to be updated is determined by evaluating the Node Set Binding. If the collection is empty, the insert action has no effect. The rules for selecting the index are as follows: b) If the result is NaN, the insert appends to the end of the node-set. c) If the resulting index is outside the valid range of the node-set, it is replaced with either 1 or the size of the node-set, whichever is closer. so how should a shopping cart for example actually be built? I want: add item remove item checkout I dont want an append item for the case that there are none items, and I really dont want to have to specially bother with the zero case (how is this done anyway?). what am I missing? much lost Jason.
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 06:24:52 UTC