- From: Jason <jeacott@hardlight.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:54:28 +1030
- To: www-forms <www-forms@w3.org>
Hi all, Today I decided it was time to upgrade the version of chiba I've
been using for my xforms only to find that its behaviour has changed. I
checked a few other implementations and they all seem to agree on this
point, so I'm totally confused.
up until now I've been using a trigger with something like:
<xforms:insert bind="bind_1" at="index('repeat_1')" position="after"/>
in order to allow form users to add items to lists. BUT if they remove
all the items from the list then this no longer works and I apparently
need a completely different button to get the first item on the list
again. Is this true? My existing copy of chiba just inserts, even if
there are currently no items in the list. how is this supposed to work?
how have people built real life forms to cope with this odd behaviour(imho)
I've had another look at the w3c position for xforms 1.0 and it seems to
suggest that this behaviour is designed (unless the "homogeneous
collection" is actually meant to mean the collection that exists at form
startup including any implied nodes from binding lazily? )
ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms/slice9.html#action-insert
The homogeneous collection to be updated is determined by evaluating the
Node Set Binding. If the collection is empty, the insert action has no
effect.
The rules for selecting the index are as follows:
b) If the result is NaN, the insert appends to the end of the node-set.
c) If the resulting index is outside the valid range of the node-set, it
is replaced with either 1 or the size of the node-set, whichever is closer.
so how should a shopping cart for example actually be built?
I want:
add item
remove item
checkout
I dont want an append item for the case that there are none items, and I
really dont want to have to specially bother with the zero case (how is
this done anyway?).
what am I missing?
much lost
Jason.
Received on Friday, 3 November 2006 06:24:52 UTC