- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 20:54:19 -0800
- To: Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF574005FF.9B7C4F2C-ON882570ED.001AA334-882570ED.001AF1D0@ca.ibm.com>
We also generate a link exception in Workplace Forms. It's been agreed that this is the only available exception in 1.0 and that we would define a parse exception in 1.1 (because an instance must contain a well-formed XML document, and empty document doesn't satisfy that) John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/ Aaron Reed <aaronr@us.ibm.com> Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org 01/04/2006 04:49 PM To www-forms@w3.org cc Subject empty instance generates link exception? Hey, I just want to verify that an empty instance element should generate a xforms-link-exception, right? For example, <xforms:model> <xforms:instance id="myInstance"/> </xforms:model> My reading of the spec leads me to think so since the instance document can't be well-formed without a root element which should generate a xforms-link-exception. The different processors seem to behave inconsitently with my testcase. Novell gives the warning. X-Smiles has their own processor error and formsPlayer and Mozilla just let it proceed as normal. Please let me know what the proper behavior should be. Thanks, --Aaron
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 04:54:44 UTC