- From: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <u.n.l@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:29:40 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: www-forms@w3.org
John, I just thought of having dynamic attribute(s) on xf:dispatch too. I think this issue already popped up on the list but frankly speaking I'm just to lazy to search the archives right now. However, I think it would be most useful having either @name or @target or both attributes being computed by XPath expressions. I think @target is the more interesting case, just like for xf:setfocus/@control and xf:toggle/@case. Best, Uli. John Boyer wrote: > > Hi Ulrich, > > Could you send me a quick note, please, to tell me a little more about > what you want to see for xf:dispatch? > > However, I did understand the part about precedence, and yes it will be > included as we faced the same precedence rule issue when we added > resource as a child of submission. > > Cheers, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist > Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/ > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > > > > > *Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <u.n.l@gmx.net>* > Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org > > 08/18/2006 04:25 AM > > > To > John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA > cc > Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, www-forms@w3.org > Subject > Re: Can toggle@case or case@selected be calculated? > > > > > > > > > > John, > > please include <xf:dispatch/> too. And - just for completeness - don't > forget the precedence stuff (bindings ruling out static attributes ?). > > However, I don't like the sub-markup approach that much. I'd prefer a > @value attribute. > > Regards, > Uli. > > John Boyer wrote: > > > > I generally like the type of approach Eric describes in which we use a > > sub-element with a value attribute, where the subelement takes the same > > name as the attribute it controls. > > > > I like it better than ATVs because ATVs open a Pandora's box of > > processing questions, whereas the subelement/@value idea allows us to > > add functionality precisely where it's needed in a way that is easy for > > form authors to grasp and for design environments to recognize. > > > > In this case, though, my proposal on today's telecon was to do a > > spec-ready version of the more specific solution I posted earlier to > > this list, which was to make available a subelement/@value solution for > > setting the case of a toggle action and the control of a setfocus, e.g. > > > > <toggle> > > <case value="concat('case-', some/node)"/> > > </toggle> > > > > <setfocus> > > <control value="concat('control-', some/node)"/> > > </setfocus> > > > > Based on having received the action item to do so on today's telecon, I > > will be making that spec-ready text available to the WG shortly, but the > > solution is so easy that I would not be surprised to see implementer > > feedback even before I finish the formal spec work! Partly because > > XForms just needs to be able to do this (whereas there's a whole > > Pandora's box of issues that this solution happily avoids). > > > > Best regards, > > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > > Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist > > Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group > > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > > IBM Victoria Software Lab > > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/ > > > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > > > > > > > > > > *Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>* > > Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org > > > > 08/16/2006 11:34 AM > > > > > > To > > www-forms@w3.org > > cc > > > > Subject > > Re: Can toggle@case or case@selected be calculated? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Klotz, Leigh wrote: > > > Two issues come to mind: > > > 1. Currently @selected it's defined as an xsd:boolean (an enumeration > > of the strings "true", "false", "1", and "0". > > > Unfortunately, "true" isn't an XPath expression that evaluates to > > "true"; that would have to be "true()", so there's not the smooth > > upgrade path that it seems like there might be. > > > > One possible direction, syntactically, would be to use a nested element, > > as we may do for xforms:submission in 1.1. E.g.: > > > > <xforms:case> > > <xforms:selected value="instance('my-instance')/my-value = 3"/> > > ... > > > > or something like this. Ideally I would prefer attribute value templates > > (post-1.1)but as you point out there is a discrepancy between 'true' > > and true(). > > > > -Erik > > > > -- > > Orbeon - XForms Everywhere: > > http://www.orbeon.com/blog/ > > > > > > > -- > Ulrich Nicolas Lissé > > > -- Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
Received on Friday, 18 August 2006 19:30:12 UTC