- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:03:19 +0100
- To: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@mclink.it>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Hi Alessandro, > This sounds like a great idea. I was thinking more in "static" terms... We use XInclude a lot, but the problem is the forms can end up very big. What we're really after is a situation where the author doesn't have to think about it, but how do you explain to an author why they can't use 10 XInclude statements? > ... but > deferred loading is more interesting than static aggregation and covers even > more use cases. Yes, I agree. Replacing part of a form with HTML is something that is done a lot in the Ajax world, but it's very difficult to manage in a scripted environment. Our approach using XForms makes it really easy. > Did you say you are going to implement this? Yes, we've already implemented it. And you have inspired me to write a short blog entry about it too, which shows an example of the mark-up: <http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2006/08/using-subforms-in-xforms.html> All the best, Mark -- Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2006 23:03:25 UTC