- From: David Landwehr <david.landwehr@solidapp.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 14:20:36 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
Hi John, I have always believed that the word data-type covered both complex and simple data types. Since xsi:type can be used to assign complex types to an element I would believe this should also be the case for bind/@type. Best regards, David John Boyer wrote: > > Our read of XForms spec says that type MIP is for data types only. > > So, what should happen in the invalid case that a form author does > attempt to associate a complex (structural) type with a subtree node > using the xforms type mip? > > We think the behavior is undefined, so an implementation is free to > sometimes return true and other times false without reaching > interoperability with other implementations. > > Opinions? > > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > Senior Product Architect/Research Scientist > Co-Chair, W3C XForms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/software/ > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/boyer/index.jsp > -- -------------------------------------------- David Landwehr (david.landwehr@solidapp.com) Chief Executive Officer, SolidApp Web: http://www.solidapp.com Office: +45 48268212 Mobile: +45 24275518 --------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 12:20:49 UTC