- From: Andy Harrison <andyh@agaricus.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:19:22 +0000
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Hi, I'm trying to get my head around datatypes in XForms (and XForms in general). I'd like to be able to specify simple types in a WYSIWG type form creation tool. If my little tool allows someone to restict the "maxlength" of a text field (or max value of a numeric or something) I read that one way to do this is via XML Schema simple type base (e.g string) and applying xsd:restriction (facets). There are a few examples out there where an xsd file is referenced from the xforms:model with this kind of arrangement. The examples I have seen always have an "xsd:element" that binds the new type to an element in the instance data. My question is... can I discard the xsd:element definition in favour of an XForms model binding? Sorry if some of my terminology isn't a concise as it might be. I've tried to create a little snippet to covey what I mean... thanks andy <!-- model snippet --> <model xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms" schema="myschema.xsd"> <instance id="blah"> <!-- some random piece of instance data --> <stuff xmlns=""> <tag>Hello World</tag> <othertag /> </stuff> </instance> <bind ref="tag" id="tagbind" type="xsd:string" /> <bind ref="othertag" id="othertagbind" type="xsd:mysimpletype" /> </model> <!-- myschema.xsd --> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="" elementFormDefault="qualified"> <xsd:simpleType name="mysimpletype"> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:enumeration value="bar" /> <xsd:enumeration value="foo" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> </xsd:schema>
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2005 17:10:10 UTC