- From: Jason Eacott <jeacott@hardlight.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:13:44 +0930
- To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
nice! Date sent: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 15:41:38 -0700 From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> To: <avernet@orbeon.com>, <www-forms@w3.org> Subject: RE: XForms on Mobile Devices Forwarded by: www-forms@w3.org Date forwarded: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 22:42:14 +0000 > > Alex, > Check this out: > http://www.beaufour.dk/blog-archives/2005/05/xforms_status_u_11.html > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=xforms+minimo > Leigh. > > -----Original Message----- > From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Alessandro Vernet > Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2005 9:56 PM > To: www-forms@w3.org > Subject: XForms on Mobile Devices > > > XForms already provides a number of benefits compared to HTML 4 forms on > browsers, but would be even more valuable on mobile devices (for > instance: > less round-trips with the server, lesser need for JavaScript, device > independence). Despite the benefits, XForms on mobile devices seems to > be an emerging technology at best, with so far only two major > initiatives I am aware of, from IBM and Oracle (see below). > > Are there other initiatives I am not aware of? More generally, what is > the state of XForms on mobile devices? > > Alex > > -- Jason Eacott Hardlight Interactive http://www.hardlight.com.au Support bacteria - they're the only culture some people have.
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 00:00:14 UTC