- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:43:46 +0200
- To: www-forms@w3.org
I am reading the erratum here:
http://www.w3.org/2003/10/REC-xforms-10-20031014-errata.html#E29
This means to me that in the following example:
<my-element>2000-01-02</my-element>
Where we have a schema saying:
<element name="my-element" type="date"/>
o Validity for <my-element> is determined by:
o the presence of the correct attributes (none here); an invalid
value for an attribute does not cause my-element to be invalid
o the validity of children elements (none here)
o the validity of the children text nodes (here 2000-01-02)
Now for the last point, the erratum says that:
"The XML Schema validity of a text node is defined as the locally
[sic] validity of its normalized content with respect to the type
definition associated from a model bind as defined by String
Valid. If the text node has no type associated it is always
considered valid."
This appears to mean that "2000-01-02" will not be validated with the
schema's type="date" constraint, but rather that you need to have a
separate xforms:bind/@type attribute. However, this appears a little
curious.
Does anybody have a better understanding of this issue? What is the
spec's intent?
Thanks,
-Erik
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 19:43:53 UTC