- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 10:58:25 -0700
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Cc: "Micah Dubinko" <micah@dubinko.info>, <www-forms@w3.org>
Mark, Thanks for pointing it out. I was exploring upload without binding on the primary binding site for 1.1, not for Xforms 1.0, where it is clearly mandatory. It's not clear to me what the right thing for an implementation to do is when upload is bound to xsd:anyURI and the serialization mechanism is not multipart/related, which is what I think your idea is. It does possible that sending a URI only would be reasonable. But what happens if you have two uploads bound to different sites in the same instance, and one needs to upload a file, and the other doesn't? If you specify multipart/related submission, then both will upload files. Leigh. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Birbeck [mailto:mark.birbeck@x-port.net] Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 5:03 AM To: Klotz, Leigh Cc: 'Micah Dubinko'; www-forms@w3.org Subject: FW: Directory picker control Hi Leigh, > Micah, > Are you imagining this? > > <upload> > <label>foo</label> > <filename ref="fn" /> > </upload> > > I.e., upload with no single-node binding attributes? Unfortunately you cannot leave off the single node binding. However, the spec already allows for us to do what Micah wants, as follows (I think it was actually you who designed this feature!): <xf:bind nodeset="my-file" type="xsd:anyURI" /> <xf:upload ref="my-file"> <xf:label>Choose file</xf:label> </xf:upload> I like this approach, since -- in keeping with the 'principles' of XForms -- we obtain different behaviour at the UI level by changing the data type at the model level. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Monday, 18 April 2005 17:59:19 UTC