- From: Gerald Bauer <luxorxul@yahoo.ca>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 10:48:22 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-forms@w3.org
Hello, Elliote Rusty Harold (of XML in a Nutshell, Effective XML, XML Bible, XOM and more fame) has covered live last week's WWW2004 conference in New York in his Cafe con Leche blog. This week Elliote wrapped up his thoughts and looked back and writes: Yesterday I wrote about what I didn't like at WWW2004 (the Semantic Web). Today I'm going to write about what I did like, because there was one technology presented that really impressed me, and that I think is going to be a key part of development in the very near future, with an exponential growth rate for the next couple of years. That technology is XForms. Like many successful technologies before it (XML, HTML, Java, Linux), XForms doesn't really let you do anything you can't do today. It is not radically new. It does not require reorganizing the way one runs a business or develops software. Unlike the semantic web, it does not require learning completely new and unfamiliar areas of technology such as ontologies and inference systems. What XForms does do is give developers the tools to write a lot of the applications they're already writing today much more quickly, cleanly, and robustly. I'm still learning about XForms, but what I see impresses me a lot. More @ http://www.cafeconleche.org/oldnews/news2004May25.html Do you share Elliote's outlook that W3C's XForms is the next big thing after XML, HTML, Java and Linux? Are there any alternatives to W3C's XForms or is W3C's XForms the only option for creating next-gen forms in XML? Please let us know what you think and post your comments and thoughts. - Gerald ------------------- Gerald Bauer Open XUL Alliance - A Rich Internet For Everyone | http://xul.sourceforge.net ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 10:48:53 UTC