- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:46:43 EDT
- To: www-forms@w3.org
- Cc: XForms@yahoogroups.com
- Message-ID: <1c0.1753ef27.2da54423@aol.com>
In a message dated 07/04/2004 12:11:31 GMT Daylight Time, mseaborne@origoservices.com writes: > Hi, > > As some of you know the company I work for, Origo Services (b-to-b, XML > standards body for UK Life Insurance) ran a one day conference on XForms > yesterday. > > I just wanted to quickly mention one or two product related things were > mentioned that I thought might be of general interest. > > Firstly, David Boloker, IBM's CTO of Emerging Technologies told us that IBM > has begun work on implementing XForms native in Mozilla (though he did say > that it will take a _really_ long time to do). David also mentioned that > they are also working on XForms support in WebSphere Portal Server, Lotus > Workplace and Pervasive Computing. > > Secondly, Novell demo'ed an IE plug-in that they are working on. No release > date was given, but we were told that it will be a free download when it is > ready. > > All the best > > Mark > Mark, A practical question. Do you envisage that all XForms plugins for Internet Explorer will be equal? What is the benefit for the XForms community of having several viewers? I can see a benefit if one particular viewer is visibly substandard but if one assumes the existence of a complete and conforming XForms viewer for Internet Explorer what is the need for another? I can see a much more evident gap in the market for XForms design tools than in the market for XForms viewers. A couple of competent, usable XForms design tools are now around but, in my view at least, have some distance to go to catch up with Microsoft's InfoPath and Adobe's XML/PDF Designer as XML-based forms design tools. I am not knocking the XForms design tools but Microsoft and Adobe are not beginners at the job of creating good tools. And that experience shows. Thoughts? Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2004 07:47:38 UTC