- From: Kevin Ross <kross@integra-online.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:23:51 -0600
- To: <www-forms@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Bob Foster'" <bob@objfac.com>
- Message-ID: <00e101c2ea3d$baf26e70$74caa8c0@ISS>
W3 group members, Wouldn't it be prudent to validate a schema before publishing it as a candidate recommendation? Sorry for the criticism, maybe there were circumstances in which it was valid at the time of publishing. Shouldn't there be an update to the spec page with a valid schema? Bob, thanks for your reply, I'm far from a schema guru. I attempted what you said with no success. Since I'm clueless past basic understanding of schemas, would you spell the fix out for me? Kevin -----Original Message----- From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bob Foster Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:12 PM To: Kevin Ross; www-forms@w3.org Subject: Re: schema appears to be invalid? Looks like it's missing an enclosing xsd:simpleType. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin <mailto:kross@integra-online.com> Ross To: www-forms@w3.org Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: schema appears to be invalid? I am attempting to use the schema for xforms, but it appears to be invalid. Is this a bug? Am I missing something? I am using xml spy. Unexpected child element: 'xsd:union' <xsd:attribute name="includenamespaceprefixes" use="optional"> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:list> <xsd:union> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:NCNAME"/> </xsd:simpleType> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:enumeration value="#default"/> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> </xsd:union> </xsd:list> </xsd:simpleType> </xsd:attribute> Kevin Ross
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 10:25:16 UTC