- From: Kevin Ross <kross@integra-online.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:23:51 -0600
- To: <www-forms@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Bob Foster'" <bob@objfac.com>
- Message-ID: <00e101c2ea3d$baf26e70$74caa8c0@ISS>
W3 group members,
Wouldn't it be prudent to validate a schema before publishing it as a
candidate recommendation? Sorry for the criticism, maybe there were
circumstances in which it was valid at the time of publishing.
Shouldn't there be an update to the spec page with a valid schema?
Bob, thanks for your reply, I'm far from a schema guru. I attempted
what you said with no success. Since I'm clueless past basic
understanding of schemas, would you spell the fix out for me?
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: www-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:www-forms-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Foster
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 6:12 PM
To: Kevin Ross; www-forms@w3.org
Subject: Re: schema appears to be invalid?
Looks like it's missing an enclosing xsd:simpleType.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Kevin <mailto:kross@integra-online.com> Ross
To: www-forms@w3.org
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:35 AM
Subject: schema appears to be invalid?
I am attempting to use the schema for xforms, but it appears to be
invalid. Is this a bug? Am I missing something? I am using xml spy.
Unexpected child element: 'xsd:union'
<xsd:attribute name="includenamespaceprefixes" use="optional">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:list>
<xsd:union>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:NCNAME"/>
</xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="#default"/>
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:union>
</xsd:list>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:attribute>
Kevin Ross
Received on Friday, 14 March 2003 10:25:16 UTC