- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 13:24:57 +0100
- To: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com>, <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
Typo in the URI of my blog, corrected: [2] http://webaccess.mozquito.com/features/index.xml - Sebastian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer" <schnitz@mozquito.com> To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:09 PM Subject: Re: XForms Implementations which are actually Working software?? > > Andrew, all, > > I'm starting to like your humor :-) You never give up, do you? > > Organizing beta-testers and checking the implementations like > a lawyer seems to be both constructive for XForms as well as > fit your personality... *chuckle* > > Go for it. Just don't start again making people and yourself > look stupid. We can really all live together in a friendly and > respectful manner... So let's move on.... > > The W3C is holding a public implementation workshop end > of February [1]. > > Anyone can show up claiming he has XForms 1.0 CR > implementation. The working group will be there. We will > look at the stuff. Feedback from that Workshop as well as > perhaps results from your latest endeavour, Andrew, will help > us clean up and re-organize the List of Implementations on the > W3C XForms page... > > :-) > > Just to not leave the impression as if there weren't several > real pieces of software working, I've been successfully managing > my blog over at [2] for over half a year thru an XForm in > X-Smiles. Novell XForms and FormsPlayer to me seem to be in > really good shape too. With my own implementor's hat on, yes, > DENG is still work-in-progress and not just there yet. :-) > In general, getting more information on the exact state > of *all* implementations is a Good Thing. The WG is holding > the implementation workshop, other efforts in that direction > are - of course - most welcome and appreciated... > > - Sebastian > > [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2003/ImplementationWorkshop/Overview.html > [2] http://webaccess.mozquito.com/feautres/index.xml > > ---- Original Message ----- > From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> > To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:07 PM > Subject: XForms Implementations which are actually Working software?? > > > > > > I was wondering if members of the two mailing lists could collectively > list > > all the XForms implementations that are currently functional? ... by which > I > > mean implementations which (more or less, please state which) provide the > > functionality of the XForms CR (either conforming level is of interest to > > me). > > > > I know that the W3C XForms page lists many pieces of software but (at > least > > according to the description on the Web page) some of those appear to be > > "wish ware" rather than projects which have functioning software currently > > available. > > > > Over to the implementors ..... :) ... Which of you have software which is > > currently functional and publicly available? > > > > Alternatively are there XForms implementors out there who would appreciate > > some more beta testers? > > > > Andrew Watt > > "XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to > implement > > yesterday's technology tomorrow" > > >
Received on Friday, 31 January 2003 07:26:21 UTC