- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:20:43 +0100
- To: <helge.langer@students.jku.at>, <www-forms@w3.org>
I'm pointing you to a discussion in the BugZilla system [1], simply to illustrate that the Mozilla Community themselves have understood that XForms and XUL are not "either/or" technologies. - Sebastian [1] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97806#c37 PS: Please Note, John Keiser (Netscape) later says in that thread: "And let's quit using this [BugZilla] for discussing whether to do it [XForms]". So please keep in mind that posting the above link is just For Your Information only, and not intended for re-opening the discussion on the BugZilla system. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Langer Helge" <helge.langer@students.jku.at> To: <www-forms@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 9:56 AM Subject: What about XUL? > > Hi everyone, > > I have a general question: If I want to implement an application which > uses XML-based user interfaces - what about XUL? I know, XUL is a > mozilla thing, but is it possible that XUL will become pervasive in the > future? And how can I compare XUL to XForms, is XUL a more powerful > language, because it doesn't only model user interactions but it > describes whole user interfaces? > I'm rather new to this topic so I would appreciate to get some hints > which help me with my decisions.. > > Thank you, > Helge Langer > >
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 06:22:01 UTC