- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:17:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Cc: www-forms@w3.org
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer wrote: >>> >>> First, calling it XForms Basic when the specification itself states that >>> it is not a subset of Xforms and the W3C already has an XForms Basic >>> is not only misleading, but some could say pretty sleazy. >> >> The name is temporary and will probably change at some point. The current >> name was a suggestion by Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer (one of the members of >> the working group). > > [...] This route would result in a justified naming of "XForms Basic", > no-one can seriously believe or expect that I alone speaking for myself > would have any authority of issueing the name XForms Basic to a spec > being developed outside the XForms WG and the W3C. [...] My apologies, I did not intend to make it sound like you had "issued" the name or that you had endorsed it in any way. -- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL U+1047E /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 6 December 2003 10:20:34 UTC