- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:20:47 +0200
- To: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@origoservices.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: Sent to www-forms-editor@w3.org and www-forms@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Seaborne" <MSeaborne@origoservices.com> To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:44 PM Subject: [Moderator Action] RE: Schema Modularisation in XForms (Was: xslt stylesheet for xforms to xhtml) > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com] > Sent: 02 September 2002 14:58 > To: Mark Seaborne; xforms@yahoogroups.com; www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-editor@w3.org > Subject: Schema Modularisation in XForms (Was: xslt stylesheet for xforms to xhtml) > > > >It seems to me that it would be very useful to have modularisation of schema (the generic term) support in XForms, > >rather than a "hard-wired" need for W3C XML Schema support. > > I can see it both ways. Sticking with W3C XML Schema (incidentally, shouldn't the draft use the full name, rather than the ambiguous 'XML Schema') + some extra validation facilities makes life easier for implementers and authors alike, in that they know what they can expect - you get a stable base and simpler portability. > > Plug-in schema language support implies, among other things: setting schema validation order/precedence/alternatives; > to provide graceful handling of non-support of schema languages by implementations, etc. This would probably be a lot of work - I don't know, it is not something I have ever tried to do. > > On the other hand it would make XForms seriously useful in ways it cannot so easily be just now. Take Schematron - its built-in support for workflow type applications should make it an ideal partner for forms based applications. > > As you say, it would have been better to bring this up a long time ago; in fact I would be surprised if it hasn't already been talked about a long time ago. > > All the best > > Mark
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:20:50 UTC