- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:15:30 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:12 PM Subject: [Moderator Action] XForms WD 20020821 - 3.2.1 Host Languages, Foreign Attributes and XForms > > > > What is the design rationale behind the statement that all XForms elements > must accept foreign attributes? > > Does this mean that all XForms elements must accept XLink elements, for > example? Or is 3.2.2 intended implicitly to exclude XLink elements in the > context of 3.2.1? > > If the only foreign attributes NOT allowed generally on XForms elements are > XLink attributes what is the cause for such anti-XLink prejudice in the > XForms WG? > > Am I correct in assuming that "foreign attributes" means attributes from > namespaces other than the XForms namespace? > > 3.2.1 also states that a host language "must" include an attribute of type > xsd:ID on each XForms element. Why? > > I suggest that either some explanation be provided in 3.2.1 or a forward > reference given to some discussion of the thinking behind these decisions. > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:16:08 UTC