- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:13:23 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org>; <xforms@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:50 AM Subject: [Moderator Action] XForms WD 20020821 - Abstract > > > > There are a couple of parts of the Abstract which seem to me to merit > editing. > > In the first paragraph it reads, "By splitting traditional XHTML forms into > three parts—XForms model, instance data, and user interface ..." > > In reality "traditional XHTML forms" do not have those three parts - there > is, for example, no XForms model in an HTML/XHTML form. > > I suggest it be redrafted to read something like, "Rather than having a > monolithic approach to forms, as evidenced in traditional XHTML forms, XForms > separates the XForms model, instance data and user interface ..." > > Or, alternatively, omit the mention of "traditional XHTL forms" and simply > state that XForms splits a form into three parts. > > In the second paragraph of the Abstract I suggest that between "be integrated > into other" and "markup languages" there be inserted "XML". Alternatively it > should be indicated that both XML and non-XML languages are targeted. > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:14:12 UTC