- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:10:38 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <www-forms-editor@w3.org> Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 3:39 PM Subject: [Moderator Action] Multiple pages per "form" - more clarity needed? > > > > Chapter 4.3 of the XForms Requirements documents refers (among other things) > to supporting multiple pages per form. > > It isn't obvious to me exactly how this normative requirement should be > interpreted. The vagueness about what is or is not an XForms "form" again > arises here. Since I am presently unclear about what an XForms "form" > actually is I am not sure how to interpret the Requirements document. > > Are we, for example, referring to an XForms model which is duplicated on two > separate-but-related XHTML pages? With each page having some of the XForms > form controls? Does xforms:instance on page 1 only have the initialization > data for the form controls on page 1? Or for both pages? > > If the latter scenario, then how is a field that is displayed on page 2 that > is required to be non-empty to be processed, assuming that data is submitted > when the form controls on the first page are filled in? > > Or is the type of layout solution I have used on http://www.XMML.com with SVG > "mini pages" the kind of scenario which is envisaged? ... with, of course, > XForms form controls where there are currently only SVG text-containing > mini-pages. > > To what extent, if any, is an XForms processor responsible for bringing the > parts of the instance data together? > > Andrew Watt
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:11:12 UTC