Friday, 1 February 2002
Thursday, 31 January 2002
Wednesday, 30 January 2002
Tuesday, 29 January 2002
- RE: Question about changelog
- RE: FW: XForms how-to
- Re: FW: XForms how-to
- RE: XForms how-to
- RE: XForms how-to
- Question about changelog
- RE: XForms how-to
Monday, 28 January 2002
- how to make relevant only when valueChanged?
- FW: XForms how-to
- clarification of revalidate vs recalculate
Saturday, 26 January 2002
Friday, 25 January 2002
- Re: Should we really care about legacy?
- Re: Should we really care about legacy?
- Should we really care about legacy?
- Reminder about last call comments
Thursday, 24 January 2002
- XML Schema for XLink
- RE: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002
- RE: XForms, client or server layer
- RE: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002
- RE: XForms, client or server layer
- RE: simple question about buttons in conjunction with javascript
- simple question about buttons in conjunction with javascript
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- RE: XForms, client or server layer
Wednesday, 23 January 2002
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- XForms, client or server layer
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated,in XForms
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData
- Re: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- RE: GET should be encouraged, not deprecated, in XForms [was: Issue request for the TAG: XForms]
- AW: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData
Tuesday, 22 January 2002
Monday, 21 January 2002
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: ANNOUNCE: X-Smiles 0.5, with partial XForms Last Call WD support
- RE: Creating, editing and viewing of data
- ANNOUNCE: X-Smiles 0.5, with partial XForms Last Call WD support
- Re: XForm specifications
- XForm specifications
- RE: XForms WD 20020118 - Questions about instanceData
- Creating, editing and viewing of data
- Repeating nested structures
Sunday, 20 January 2002
Saturday, 19 January 2002
Friday, 18 January 2002
- RE: FORMs and GET
- RE: FORMs and GET
- XForms Basic.
- About the bind element
- About the new (?) draft 18 january 2002
- Re: PUT
- The XForms 1.0 Last Call Working Draft is now public.
- Last call announcement for XForms 1.0
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- RE: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
Thursday, 17 January 2002
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Re: FORMs and GET
- Chapter 8.8 - submit form control
- 8.9 - the selectOne form control
- FORMs and GET
Wednesday, 16 January 2002
- Re: PUT
- Re: XForms, XML media types, SOAP
- Re: PUT
- Re: Should instance element be optional?
- Re: Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1
Tuesday, 15 January 2002
- Re: PUT
- RE: Should instance element be optional?
- RE: XForms, XML media types, SOAP
- Re: Reusable form controls
- RE: PUT
- RE: Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1
- Re: Should instance element be optional?
- Restriction for submit event in section 11.4.1
- RE: Should instance element be optional?
- Re: Should instance element be optional?
- new form controls
- RE: Should instance element be optional?
- Re: Should instance element be optional?
- Should instance element be optional?
- Re: type of instance data
- Re: type of instance data
- Re: insert action suggestion
Monday, 14 January 2002
- insert action suggestion
- Add XSLT transform element to head element set
- RE: PUT
- RE: type of instance data
- [www-forms] <none>
- Re: xsd:decimal type - too parochial?
- Re: type of instance data
Saturday, 12 January 2002
Friday, 11 January 2002
- listItem and listItems datatypes
- PUT
- XForms, XML media types, SOAP
- RE: type of instance data
- xsd:decimal type - too parochial?
- type of instance data
Thursday, 10 January 2002
- Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression
- Add XSLT transform element to head element set
- RE: Invitation to contribute examples
- Re: insert action suggestion
- Re: Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression
- Re: Invitation to contribute examples
- Problems to interpret an attribute value as an Xpath expression
- Re: Invitation to contribute examples
- Re: Invitation to contribute examples
- RE: Section 2.7 Example Revisions
- RE: New WD, Section 2.7 Complete Document
- RE: The RDF in WD-xforms-20011207
- RE: New Specification errors
Wednesday, 9 January 2002
Tuesday, 8 January 2002
- insert action suggestion
- Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- Re: Invitation to contribute examples
- RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- Invitation to contribute examples
- Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- cursor update
- RE: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- Re: scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
Monday, 7 January 2002
- FYI: XForms at O'Reilly Open Source/XTech 2002 in San Diego
- Implementations of December XForms WD?
- scope of id() (was: recalculating several models)
- RE: recalculating several models
- Re: recalculating several models
- RE: recalculating several models
- Re: recalculating several models
- AW: recalculating several models
- RE: recalculating several models
- recalculating several models
Friday, 4 January 2002
- Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate
- Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate
- Re: Order of xforms:revalidate and xforms:recalculate