- From: Kurt George Gjerde <kurt.gjerde@intermedia.uib.no>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:26:40 +0200 (MET DST)
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: > The two parts of the example code do not seem, to me at least, to correspond. > > For example, the ref attribute of the abominable <select1> element contains > the value of "method". > > If I was coding this I would give it the value of "root/method". This works > in X-Smiles. According to what I've learned the last couple of days the current node of an instance is the "root" node (whatever it may be called), not the xforms:instance itself. So the current (or eval context) in this example is <root>. So ref "method" and "/root/method" is the same. See 7.3 and this weeks "absolute/relative" thread in www-forms. > Is the code in the WD in error? Or is the way I have been coding XForms in > X-Smiles incorrect? I initially did it the same way you did (and so has other implementations I've seen) but I've now altered my code. best, -Kurt. __________ kurt george gjerde <kurt.gjerde@intermedia.uib.no> intermedia uib, university of bergen
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 09:27:17 UTC