- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:15:51 EDT
- To: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org, xforms@yahoogroups.com
It seems to me that the WD needs some careful editing to remove potential confusion relating to what is and is not a "root element". The example in 2.1 uses a <root> element inside xforms:instance. In 7.2 it is stated that instance data always has a single "root element". It seems to me that it would be better to avoid <root> elements inside xforms:instance in examples. To leave them in is simply inviting avoidable confusion. Of course the Schema for XForms makes it clear that there need not be a <root> element as "root element" (sic) for instance data. Secondly, the term "root element" has a specific meaning in XML 1.0. It doesn't seem to me that it is always clear in the XForms WD when instance data is free standing and therefore may correctly be said to have a "root element" and when it is nested inside xforms:instance when it would be incorrect, in my view, to claim it has a "root element". The root element may, of course, be in a non-XForms host language. Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 08:16:01 UTC