- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 05:22:51 EST
- To: www-forms@w3.org, xforms@yahoogroups.com
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 05:23:01 UTC
In a message dated 29/10/01 10:13:13 GMT Standard Time, jth@dns.mikrobitti.fi writes: > I have trouble seeing "XForms forms" as a good solution, although I agree > that it probably is technically the most correct one. > > The REALLY natural terms IMO are "XForm" and "XForms", despite the fact > that the singular of "XForms" is specifically mentioned as being wrong. > Other languages make this more interesting though; "XForms form" > translates to about "XForms-lomake" in Finnish, and since the translation > is no more hampered by the repetition of "forms", I might even imagine > someone using it. However, the English version "XForms form" sounds a bit > too complicated to get used to. Jouni, Thanks for the reply. In the August WD the reference to XForms being singular seemed to have been removed - hence my poor joke about "alms" and legs. :) So, is the WG working towards legitimising "XForm"? Time will probably tell. Andrew Watt
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 05:23:01 UTC