- From: Josef Dietl <josef@mozquito.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:31:31 +0200
- To: "Erik van Oosten" <erik.van.oosten@backstream.com>, "www-forms mailinglist (E-mail)" <www-forms@w3.org>
OK, we'll see what we can do in the framework XML Schema gives us. Josef > -----Original Message----- > From: Erik van Oosten [mailto:erik.van.oosten@backstream.com] > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:00 AM > To: www-forms mailinglist (E-mail) > Subject: RE: evaluation context > > > > > Weeell... this example is precisely one of the more > tricky cases. I > do > > > remember extended discussions about having form controls inside > captions > > > - or more precisely, about prohibiting them. What is the > use or need > (or > > > meaning) of having, say, a xf:input _inside_ a > xf:caption? or inside > a > > > xf:help or xf:hint? We do have open content models for these three > > > because we believe that for the integration in other markup > languages, > > > it doesn' make sense to disallow markup from _these_ > languages (like > for > > > example XHTML). In the group, we are pretty convinced that XForms > inside > > > caption, help and hint does not make sense. > > > > > > What do you think about that? > > > > Except for xf:output, xf:repeat, xf:switch. These form controls and > > structures are useful inside caption, help and hint, I think... > > That is correct. The xf:output is useful for example when a > novice user > would get an elaborate explanation or hint where an expert would only > get a small reminder. > (The term 'explanation' shows more respect to the user then the term > 'help', but who cares?) > > Erik. > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2001 04:32:02 UTC