- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 05:55:42 EDT
- To: www-forms@w3.org
- CC: xforms@yahoogroups.com
- Message-ID: <9e.1707a923.287d7c9e@aol.com>
In a message dated 10/07/01 15:35:32 GMT Daylight Time, AndrewWatt2001@aol.com writes: > I am trying to get my head round how all the parts of the June 2001 WD fit > together and it seems to me that some of the parts of the draft don't fit > together correctly. > > If we start from the description in the XSD schema for XForms in Appendix > A, > which shows an xsd:sequence of submitInfo, model, instance and bind > elements > some examples don't seem to fit with the stated sequence. > > For example, in Chapter 9.4 xform:bind is shown preceding xform:instance. > > Having said "examples" (plural) I can only put my eye on one at the moment. > Another place where the inconsistency surfaces is Chapter 10.2.1, where we read for the content of the xform element: <!-- Content: (submitInfo | bind)*, model, instance --> Ignoring the fact that it is DTD syntax rather than XSD Schema, it is inconsistent with the <xsd:sequence> in Appendix A. Can someone clarify what is the intended content model of the xform element? Is Appendix A normative? Or normatively wrong? :) Thanks a lot. Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 05:55:46 UTC