- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:57:48 +0200
- To: "Kit Davies" <KDavies@categoric.com>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Jilani, Rashid" <rashid.jilani@sap.com>
- Cc: <www-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887463D90EF@winserver.windomain.mozquito.com>
Kit Davies wrote: <snip/> One day (God willing!), mainstream browsers will support XForms, and the circle will be complete. Until that distant time, XForms could still be a vital standard for those working on multi-channel, multi-protocol applications. <snip/> The good news is, the circle will be complete, without waiting until mainstream browsers will support XForms. Let me explain, but first I have to take my hat as W3C XForms co-chair off for a second. <with-no-W3C-hat-on> Mozquito will launch "XML WebAccess 2.0" this September. See attached whitepaper (PDF) for all the product details. If you install this software on your web server *it is as if every browser supports XForms today*! </with-no-W3C-hat-on> - Sebastian > -----Original Message----- > From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer [mailto:schnitz@mozquito.com] > Sent: 03 August 2001 11:18 > To: Bjoern Hoehrmann; Jilani, Rashid > Cc: www-forms@w3.org > Subject: RE: NetScape/IE > > > I agree that Microsoft and Netscape are > unlikely to support XForms, but I very > strongly disagree with the disruptive > pseudo-quote "There is nothing called > XForms, it's just a draft...". > > Only because Microsoft and Netscape do not > support XForms, for whatever reasons, this > is no indication at all whether XForms is > a good idea, whether it solves an important > problem and thus whether it has a market we > will see products being offered for. > > Or the other way around: Even if Microsoft > and Netscape *would* support XForms, how > long would you think it would take until > XForms can be used, ie. at least 80% of all > browsers deployed out there have native > XForms support? > > It would take several years, and no-one here > is willing to wait until then, since XForms > is needed, and needed now. > > XSLT, for example, took off quite well > without Microsoft and Netscape ever > implementing it in the browser. So can we all > stop judging important standards and technologies > based on Microsoft's interests and strategies > for a moment? > > XForms is very similar to XSLT in the way that > XForms as a concept can be implemented as a > generic server-side transformation process, > transcoding XForms into whatever you want > and whatever the client can process. > > Since XForms is *very* flexible (Three parts: > Model, Data Instance and UI, whereas every > part in itself is flexible - use any arbitrary > XML instance for data, use any existent or > custom UI markup language for the UI, use a > small subset, or all of XML Schema as the basis > for the Model), we do not see a single > implementation of XForms, but various depending > on the specific needs. XForms is a highly > modular, application level W3C technology with > a million use cases, solving a simple problem > by giving XML a standard, bi-directional > Human-Computer-Interface framework other XML > applications can build upon. > > Because of that, several companies have already > customly implemented XForms in their software > projects, leveraging the full power of XForms > for them without having to wait for Microsoft > and Netscape. > > All the best, > > Sebastian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] > > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 4:13 AM > > To: Jilani, Rashid > > Cc: 'www-forms@w3.org' > > Subject: Re: NetScape/IE > > > > > > * Jilani, Rashid wrote: > > >Hi: Can any one inform me what are the stand of NetSacpe and > > IE on XForms. > > >Are they planning to support it for their nexr future release? > > > > My personal opinion is that this is __very__ unlikely, especially > > because Microsoft hasn't announced XForms support [1] for IE 6 and > > Netscape will release NN6.1 very soon. > > > > [1] There is nothing called XForms, it's just a draft... > > -- > > Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } > > http://www.bjoernsworld.de > > am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { > > http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > > 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } > > http://www.learn.to/quote/ > > > > >
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: XMLWebAccessWhitepaper.pdf
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 08:57:51 UTC