- From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer <schnitz@mozquito.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:57:48 +0200
- To: "Kit Davies" <KDavies@categoric.com>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "Jilani, Rashid" <rashid.jilani@sap.com>
- Cc: <www-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D0F1529EE943B3449F755CA1A40887463D90EF@winserver.windomain.mozquito.com>
Kit Davies wrote:
<snip/>
One day (God willing!), mainstream browsers will
support XForms, and the circle will be complete.
Until that distant time, XForms could still be a
vital standard for those working on multi-channel,
multi-protocol applications.
<snip/>
The good news is, the circle will be complete,
without waiting until mainstream browsers will
support XForms.
Let me explain, but first I have to take my hat
as W3C XForms co-chair off for a second.
<with-no-W3C-hat-on>
Mozquito will launch "XML WebAccess 2.0" this
September. See attached whitepaper (PDF) for all
the product details.
If you install this software on your web server
*it is as if every browser supports XForms today*!
</with-no-W3C-hat-on>
- Sebastian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer [mailto:schnitz@mozquito.com]
> Sent: 03 August 2001 11:18
> To: Bjoern Hoehrmann; Jilani, Rashid
> Cc: www-forms@w3.org
> Subject: RE: NetScape/IE
>
>
> I agree that Microsoft and Netscape are
> unlikely to support XForms, but I very
> strongly disagree with the disruptive
> pseudo-quote "There is nothing called
> XForms, it's just a draft...".
>
> Only because Microsoft and Netscape do not
> support XForms, for whatever reasons, this
> is no indication at all whether XForms is
> a good idea, whether it solves an important
> problem and thus whether it has a market we
> will see products being offered for.
>
> Or the other way around: Even if Microsoft
> and Netscape *would* support XForms, how
> long would you think it would take until
> XForms can be used, ie. at least 80% of all
> browsers deployed out there have native
> XForms support?
>
> It would take several years, and no-one here
> is willing to wait until then, since XForms
> is needed, and needed now.
>
> XSLT, for example, took off quite well
> without Microsoft and Netscape ever
> implementing it in the browser. So can we all
> stop judging important standards and technologies
> based on Microsoft's interests and strategies
> for a moment?
>
> XForms is very similar to XSLT in the way that
> XForms as a concept can be implemented as a
> generic server-side transformation process,
> transcoding XForms into whatever you want
> and whatever the client can process.
>
> Since XForms is *very* flexible (Three parts:
> Model, Data Instance and UI, whereas every
> part in itself is flexible - use any arbitrary
> XML instance for data, use any existent or
> custom UI markup language for the UI, use a
> small subset, or all of XML Schema as the basis
> for the Model), we do not see a single
> implementation of XForms, but various depending
> on the specific needs. XForms is a highly
> modular, application level W3C technology with
> a million use cases, solving a simple problem
> by giving XML a standard, bi-directional
> Human-Computer-Interface framework other XML
> applications can build upon.
>
> Because of that, several companies have already
> customly implemented XForms in their software
> projects, leveraging the full power of XForms
> for them without having to wait for Microsoft
> and Netscape.
>
> All the best,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 4:13 AM
> > To: Jilani, Rashid
> > Cc: 'www-forms@w3.org'
> > Subject: Re: NetScape/IE
> >
> >
> > * Jilani, Rashid wrote:
> > >Hi: Can any one inform me what are the stand of NetSacpe and
> > IE on XForms.
> > >Are they planning to support it for their nexr future release?
> >
> > My personal opinion is that this is __very__ unlikely, especially
> > because Microsoft hasn't announced XForms support [1] for IE 6 and
> > Netscape will release NN6.1 very soon.
> >
> > [1] There is nothing called XForms, it's just a draft...
> > --
> > Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de }
> > http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> > am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 {
> > http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> > 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 }
> > http://www.learn.to/quote/
> >
> >
>
Attachments
- application/octet-stream attachment: XMLWebAccessWhitepaper.pdf
Received on Friday, 3 August 2001 08:57:51 UTC