- From: Joe Hewitt <jhewitt@zenimax.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 11:45:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "'www-forms@w3.org'" <www-forms@w3.org>
>> but before XForms can continue we need a working group >> for an XUL-like language as well. >I agree - why isn't there such a working group? Probably because the W3C is still hung up on using HTML and the CSS box/flow model. XUL defines a presentation model that is much different from that, and more suited to typical "applications". If the web is ever going to allow an alternative from the magazine-style page layout, we need something like XUL. It should not REPLACE what HTML and CSS currently define; it should be an alternative. I'll restate the fact that XForms should combine this functionality into it's eventual recommendation.
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 12:02:15 UTC