- From: Vlad Trakhtenberg <vladt@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:46:21 -0700
- To: www-forms-editor@w3.org
- Cc: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Message-ID: <OFA3A95A2D.AD38808B-ON882575D2.005682A3-882575D2.0056A436@ca.ibm.com>
Thanks for your reply. I accept WG's argumentation and decision. Vlad Trakhtenberg. John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Sent by: www-forms-request@w3.org 11/06/2009 08:02 To Vlad Trakhtenberg/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA cc public-forms@w3.org, www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org Subject Re: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks. Hi Vlad, Per our verbal discussion, the repeat itself does not get the enabled/disabled events because it does not have a single node binding. However, each of the implicit groups representing rows of the table would receive these events because they do have a single node binding. And those events would bubble up to the repeat. Regarding the typo in 8.1.1, it is fixed. Regarding the link, it is intended to work when the document is officially published by the W3C, so it does not work when the document is placed at the working group editorial location. Can you please reply to this email to indicate whether you are satisfied with the reply or whether you have any further concerns. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: Vlad Trakhtenberg/CanWest/IBM To: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org Cc: public-forms@w3.org, John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA Date: 03/12/2009 05:13 PM Subject: XForms 1.1 - repeat relevance & editorial tweaks. Dear WG, Is there a compelling reason for the provision that xforms-disabled/enabled event cannot target repeat (4.4.1 -4.4.11) and repeat control cannot be relevant or non-relevant (8.1.1)? Perhaps a repeat can become non-relevant'(relevant) and the xforms-disabled (enabled ) fire when it does not have any (has at least one) relevant repeat items (item)? And a couple of minor issues: 1. Typo in 8.1.1: Second bullet: ... Note: Form controls that read or write simpleContent produce this exception whenever and as soon as they are bound to an element node that an element child node. 2. The very first link: (not terribly useful ;) http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-xforms11-20090311/ does not work. Regards, Vlad Trakhtenberg.
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2009 15:46:59 UTC