- From: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 09:43:40 -0500
- To: fsasaki@w3.org
- CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Felix, due to other last call comments, src was moved from host language control to XForms, where it is governed by rules of xsd:anyURI from schema 1.0. Since Schema 1.0 doesn't support IRIs clearly and completely we don't reference the IRI RFC. Regards, Ulrich Nicolas Lissé For the Forms WG > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xforms11-20070222/ > > Comment 4 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0704-xforms11/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Location in reviewed document: > 3.2.2 > Responsibility for useability of IRIs unclear > > Comment: > > The host language may permit a Linking Attributes Collection to be > applied to XForms elements as an alternate means of obtaining content > related to the element. An example is the src attribute from [XHTML 1.0]. > The schedule by which link traversal occurs is defined by the host > language. If the link traversal fails, the host language may dispatch > xforms-link-exception or xforms-link-error to the model associated with > the in-scope evaluation context node of the element that bears the Linking > Attributes Collection for the failed link. > > Does this mean that the host language is responsible whether XForms allows > for using > IRIs [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3987.txt] > or not? Please answer this question in the specification and provide a > reference (normative or informative, depending on the answer) to the IRI > specification. > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2007 14:45:22 UTC