- From: Nick Van den Bleeken <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 05:34:04 -0500
- To: Kevin.Kelly@us.ibm.com
- CC: member-cdf@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org
Dear CDF WG, The abstract of a document is supposed to be a miniature introduction to the document's content that helps a person decide whether or not they want to read the rest of the document. The XForms 1.0 abstract was inadequate to this purpose. It is clear that the document is a specification for XForms, but the abstract cannot end there. It must explain, basically, what XForms is. The abstract then explains the relationship between XForms 1.1 and 1.0, which is also necessary. For an example of a similar abstract, please see XPath 2.0. Regards, Nick Van den Bleeken > Move the current abstract text to Section 2 Introduction to XForms, and add > appropriate abstract text stating what the document is in the abstract > section. > Rationale: http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#Abstract, the current abstract > text is really an introduction to XForms. > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 10:35:20 UTC