- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:52:24 +0900
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org, unl@dreamlab.net, www-forms-editor@w3.org, www-forms-editor-request@w3.org
Many thanks for the feedback, John. John Boyer wrote: > > Hi Felix, > > I am not an ITS expert, but I am pretty sure you didn't get it all > with that file. sure. What we think is that this file encompasses the rules which should be relevant for all XForms documents. The files we proposed are only a basic ITS definition. > > What about literals in calculate, relevant, required, readonly? from my understanding, e.g. calculate might contain translatable text in some cases, but in others not. I did not check for the other markup in your list above. However, the rules we supplied are for the general case. > What about content in xforms instance? This is raw data, not subject > to translation... necessarily. > > What about things like xforms labels, which could express their > content directly (making translation easy) or which could express > their content using binding attributes to instance data (making it > much harder to determine what must be translated). > > I'm not being exhaustive here... I'd propose the following: - having an appendix with the small rules we proposed - having in that appendix a paragraph which describes the need for XForms users to define ITS rules on their own - depending on the cases you described. What do you think? Felix >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2007 07:52:36 UTC