- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:10:05 +0900
- To: www-forms-editor@w3.org
- Cc: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Dear XForms Editors, This is a Last Call Comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/. Appendix E of this specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#mode), entitled "Input Modes", should be updated to be in sync with the most recent list of scripts from Unicode/ISO 10646. A rough count (using the Unix 'wc' utilty) showed that about 15 scripts are missing from the list of tokens at http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#mode-values. A point-by-point comparison with http://www.unicode.org/Public/5.0.0/ucd/PropertyValueAliases.txt (look below the line "# Script (sc)") gave the following list (more than 15 because E.3.1 contains quite a few special values): (starting with lowercase and converting spaces to camelcase in line with the currently available tokens (e.g. canaidianAboriginal)). balinese buginese coptic cypriot glagolitic kharoshthi limbu linearB nko osmanya phagsPa phoenician shavian sylotiNagri taiLe newTaiLue tifinagh ugaritic oldPersian cuneiform This list of tokens can be included as is (with "Unicode script name" in the Comments column), but should be cross-checked to make sure I didn't miss anything. The text above the table can then be updated to say "The version of the Unicode Standard that these script name are taken from is 5.0." instead of "The version of the Unicode Standard that these script names are taken from is 3.2.". Many of the scripts (e.g. Cunieform) are not necessarily what you would expect as your typical XForms input, but some of the tokens already available in XForms 1.0 also don't have a high probability of usage, and it's better to be complete than to leave something out that later may be needed. Some people may raise the concern that adding these script tokens will force the spec to go to Last Call again. While this would be true for any genuinely new feature being added after Last Call, it is difficult to see why a new Last Call would be needed just because the list of scripts is being completed. No XForms implementation is forced to support all of these values anyway, but not including a value that's currently not supported would create a weird chicken-and-egg problem. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2007 10:07:31 UTC