- From: John Boyer <xforms-issues@mn.aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:45:47 -0500
- To: aaronr@us.ibm.com
- CC: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Hi Aaron, Here are responses to several issues you raised in a last call comment on April 30th. Please let us know if you have any further concerns. Thanks, John Boyer 5) Section 3, Document structure - mentions XHTML 1.0. Shouldn't that be XHTML 2.0? It refers to a 'future version' of XHTML, then cites XHTML 1.0, which very well could be XHTML 2 but also pre-XHTML2 modularization profiles. We cite 1.0 because it is a recommendation. 6) Section 3.2.3 and 3.2.4 - the string 'IDREF' is used in different fonts at different times but it seems to me it is used the same way in both cases. For example, the phrase "or a bind IDREF value that refers to an ID not on a bind element" is used in both sections and in one place 'id' is used, in another 'ID' is used. And in one place IDREF is in a fixed font and in the other it looks like the default font. It gets confusing. The last sentence of 3.2.4 was the parallel of the second to last in 3.2.3. In 3.2.3, the correct fixed font and capitalization was used, but not in 3.2.4. Done. Not diff-marked. 7) Section 3.3.1 "has no predefined behavior event-based behavior." Doesn't make sense having 'behavior' here twice. Removed the entire offending phrase as the independent clause of the sentence is sufficient. Diff-marked. 8) Section 3.3.1 - "If any non-default model has a versoin..." version is misspelled. Fixed as part of a larger fix. Diff-marked. 9) Section 3.3.2 - resource attribute - you are introducing a new attribute to the instance element and don't have it in the 1.1 schema? You could also break the xforms out there that currently use @src on the instance element. -> Section 3.2.2 says that the host language can allow @src on xforms elements, for example. So what should happen if @src and @resource are on the element? Who wins? The text in 3.3.2 says that the host language linking attribute 'MAY' win. That doesn't help anyone. How is a form author supposed to code to that? Seems to me like this change needs more thought. XForms now adds the src attribute to the instance element, rather than depending on this attribute from the host language. A note was added to 3.2.2 (linking attributes), the attribute was added to 3.3.2 (instance element), and the description of model construction in 4.2.1 is also modified. Diff-marked. 10) Section 3.3.2 - incomplete sentence -> "If the host language may treat failure to traverse the link as an exception" is an incomplete sentence. The problem is fixed via the substantive change to add src to instance. Removal of the word 'If' is not directly diff-marked. 11) Section 3.3.2 - "All data relevant to the XPath data model must be preserved during processing and submission, including processing instructions, comment nodes and all whitespace". What about if @indent is specified on xf:submission? Whitespace won't be preserved during submission then. Changed to "during process and as input to submission serialization" Diff-marked. 12) Section 3.3.4 - "Element bind selects a node-set selected from the instance data" seems like poor wording to me. Why not just say, "Element bind selects a node-set from the instance data"? Done. Not diff-marked. 13) Section 3.3.4 - two periods terminating the sentence right before section 3.4. Done. Not diff-marked. 14) Section 3.5 - "Another common approach is to allow unregulated content in a few selected places." Should probably be "...in a few select places." Done. Not diff-marked.
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2007 23:04:34 UTC