- From: Micah Dubinko <mdubinko@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:16:36 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-forms-editor@w3.org
Greetings, Upon review of the DOM interfaces defined in 7.2, there are some seeming inconsistencies, or at least oddities. As currently specified, code such as this (JavaScript in this case) would be needed to modify instance data through script: var modelElem = document.getElementById("id_of_model_element"); var instDoc = modelElem.getInstanceDocument("id_of_instance_element"); // Perform operations on instDoc modelElem.rebuild(); modelElem.recalculate(); modelElem.revalidate(); modelElem.refresh(); The strange part is that the interface is based on the model element, so another idref is needed in the parameter of getInstanceDocument to say _which_ instance is needed, within the model. If my recollection serves, this goes back to the time when each model had only a single instance. Further, the four r* methods will cause *all* instances on the given model to be rebuilt/recalculated/revalidated/refreshed, which is a different level of granularity than getInstanceDocument. Request: If the implementers agree, I request that the interface be specified as part of the instance element instead, removing the need for a parameter on getInstanceData. The previous code would then look like: var instElem = document.getElementById("id_of_instance_element"); var instDoc = modelElem.getInstanceDocument(); // Perform operations on instDoc instElem.rebuild(); instElem.recalculate(); instElem.revalidate(); instElem.refresh(); Thanks, .micah ===== Find out what the fuss about XForms is all about. Full text of my book in-progress online at http://dubinko.info/writing/xforms/ __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Wednesday, 1 January 2003 19:16:37 UTC