- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:15:50 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-forms@w3.org>
Moderator: sent to www-forms@w3.org and www-forms-editor@w3.org ----- Original Message ----- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com> To: <www-forms-editor@w3.org> Cc: <xforms@yahoogroups.com>; <www-forms@w3.org>; <ryan_tomayko@stercomm.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:56 PM Subject: [Moderator Action] Fwd: XForms Reusability / Modularization (was RE: XForms WD 20020821 - 2.1 ... > I am forwarding this to www-forms-editor@w3.org since it seems to me that > there are fundamental problems with how XForms is currently designed which > have adverse effects on what I had assumed to be the modularity and > reusability of XForms code. > > If XForms code is to be written to conform primarily to the assumed future > needs of XHTML 2.0, which the current draft implies, then that has a > potentially destructive effect on the cross-platform applicability of XForms. > > If XHTML 2.0 cannot accomodate fully modular cross-platform XForms code then > it seems to me that the XForms WG needs to do some careful thinking and > possibly fundamental redesign of XForms to achieve a genuinely cross-platform > XForms. XForms does not need to be, and should not be, tied to the apron > strings of XHTML 2.0. It cannot be tied to XHTML if it is to succeed as a > modular, cross-platform, multiple host language Web forms technology. > > Andrew Watt >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 12:16:30 UTC