- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 14:13:39 EST
- To: JBoyer@PureEdge.com
- CC: www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org, Xforms@yahoogroups.com
- Message-ID: <f3.23f045bd.2b03fe63@aol.com>
In a message dated 13/11/2002 19:01:07 GMT Standard Time, JBoyer@PureEdge.com writes: > Hi Andrew, > > Please reread the introduction section of the XPath Rec. > > Thanks, > John Boyer, Ph.D. > Senior Product Architect > PureEdge Solutions Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 4:23 AM > To: www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-editor@w3.org; Xforms@yahoogroups.com > Subject: XForms CR - 3.3.1etc "XPath Extension Functions" > > > > > In 3.3.1 (and elsewhere in the CR) reference is made to "XPath Extension > Functions". > > As I recall, the XPath 1.0 Recommendation does not define any mechanism for > > creating extension functions. > > Perhaps the XForms WG intended to reference a mechanism defined other than > in > the XPath 1.0 Recommendation? > > Andrew Watt John, Nothing in a quick skim through the Introduction seems to me to contradict what I wrote earlier. Was this the section you were referring to? ... "Both XSLT and XPointer extend XPath by defining additional functions; some of these functions operate on the four basic types; others operate on additional data types defined byXSLT and XPointer.". The quoted section indicates that XSLT and XPointer provide mechanisms for extension functions. I see no reference to "extension functions" which are "XPath extension functions". If the XForms CR wishes to refer to "XSLT extension functions" or "XPointer extension functions" that's fine by me. I just think it may be incorrect for the XForms CR to refer to those as "XPath extensions functions". On reflection, do you agree? Regards Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 14:15:15 UTC