- From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:09:20 EST
- To: Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com
- CC: XForms@yahoogroups.com, www-forms@w3.org, www-forms-editor@w3.org
- Message-ID: <f.21fbd2d.2b03ef50@aol.com>
In a message dated 13/11/2002 17:49:20 GMT Standard Time, Leigh.Klotz@pahv.xerox.com writes: > Andrew, > > Thank you for your comments. We are using Chapter 2 example to part of > fully developed in Appendix G, where the "Cash" choice is used as an > example > of XML events and the xforms:message element, where it displays a message > that says "Please do not mail cash." > > We are still seeking implementation feedback, however, and if you do wish > to > send cash, please note that the message is advisory only, and is not > enforced as a validity constraint. > > Thank you, > Leigh. > Leigh, I am trying to decipher how much of your response is tongue in cheek. :) I am thinking about the impression that Chapter 2 makes on, say, a casual visitor to the XForms spec. I assumed that the XForms WG would want to convey an immediate impression in the CR that XForms is taking a realistic approach to cutting edge e-commerce. It seems obvious to me that an unrealistic example of how to use a form creates a poor initial impression. I don't recall ever seeing an online form that offers payment by cash as a practical alternative. Charging an account would allow a much more realistic example to be included. If you want a message then include something like "Your account will be charged before the goods are sent." or whatever is realistic. Anyway I have made my point. ... At least until the PR. :) Regards Andrew Watt
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2002 13:13:03 UTC