- From: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 15:16:21 +0200
- To: <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: <www-forms-editor@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 09:16:55 UTC
Shane, Your issue sent to the W3C XForms WG about the XForms Last Call Working draft http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xforms-20020118/ Your issue is archived at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/LastCallResponses.html#Issue80 issue 19 XForms WG Resolution: * ISSUE 80.19: multiple model elements, multiply rooted Roland Merrick: We don't describe this adequately; we don't want multiply-rooted. Micah Dubinko: That's a separate issue. Action 33: Roland to send message to w3c-forms about multiply-rooted instance dilemma if not discussed today. Steven Pemberton: "In the absence of a model element" Micah Dubinko: If there is no model element, there is no form. Steven Pemberton: 4.2.5 is wrong. It should say "In the absence of a Schema". Action 34: Micah to fix 4.2.5 to say "In the absence of a Schema". ---------------------------------------------------------- Please respond to state that you agree with this Resolution.
Received on Tuesday, 30 July 2002 09:16:55 UTC