- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2002 12:01:05 -0500
- To: www-forms-editor@w3.org
I just wanted to say that while GET does have known issues, there are two major advantages GET form submission results over POST submission results: 1) GET submission results can be bookmarked. Granted, browsers could jump through some hoops and "bookmark" POST form submission results by saving all the data that was posted. This, however, would be very inefficient for large POST submissions (which are currently already POST). Furthermore, there is the implicit agreement that POST submissions may change information on the server, while GET ones should not. This distinction is why POST results are not bookmarkable, since the operation that happens on the server may not be idempotent. Making all forms use POST will remove this distinction. 2) GET form submission results can be directly linked to as needed. This is much used in existing systems of various sorts from eBay to Bugzilla. This allows one to send a friend a url that will allow him to retrieve the same information that one retrieved via the form. I feel that deprecating GET without providing a non-deprecated alternative to achieve similar functionality is a bad idea. I understand that GET is still supported, but the fact that it's deprecated means it will be removed at some point (once XForms are widely used and compatibility with existing HTML is not an issue). Removing it without providing a way to achieve the same flexibility and ease-of-use for the user seems like a poor course of action to me. Thanks for your time, Boris ----------------- 617-864-9910 ----------------- Washington [D.C.] is a city of Southern efficiency and Northern charm. -- John F. Kennedy
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2002 12:01:07 UTC