- From: Roman Huditsch <roman.huditsch@hico.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 16:37:39 +0200
- To: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>, <www-forms@w3.org>, <www-forms-editor@w3.org>, <xforms@yahoogroups.com>
Would that mean that I can specify a @style for each Xform control (which is since 2 or 3 WD versions ago not part of the spec any more)? wbr, Roman -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com [mailto:AndrewWatt2001@aol.com] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. August 2002 16:12 An: www-forms@w3.org; www-forms-editor@w3.org; xforms@yahoogroups.com Betreff: XForms WD 20020821 - 3.2.1 Host Languages, Foreign Attributes and XForms What is the design rationale behind the statement that all XForms elements must accept foreign attributes? Does this mean that all XForms elements must accept XLink elements, for example? Or is 3.2.2 intended implicitly to exclude XLink elements in the context of 3.2.1? If the only foreign attributes NOT allowed generally on XForms elements are XLink attributes what is the cause for such anti-XLink prejudice in the XForms WG? Am I correct in assuming that "foreign attributes" means attributes from namespaces other than the XForms namespace? 3.2.1 also states that a host language "must" include an attribute of type xsd:ID on each XForms element. Why? I suggest that either some explanation be provided in 3.2.1 or a forward reference given to some discussion of the thinking behind these decisions. Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 10:39:47 UTC