Wednesday, 16 September 2009
Monday, 14 September 2009
Thursday, 10 September 2009
- Re: updated WOFF specification
- Re: updated WOFF specification
- updated WOFF specification
- EOT usage technique
Wednesday, 9 September 2009
- Re: Next step?
- RE: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
- Re: Next step?
- Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
- Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
- Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
- Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
- RE: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
- Re: EOT Lite (Compatibility Web Type) - sample web pages
Monday, 7 September 2009
Friday, 4 September 2009
Wednesday, 2 September 2009
Monday, 31 August 2009
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type"
- RE: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type"
Sunday, 30 August 2009
- Re: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type"
- RE: Format name proposals - "Cooperable Web Type"
- Re: Format name proposals
Saturday, 29 August 2009
Friday, 28 August 2009
Thursday, 27 August 2009
Wednesday, 26 August 2009
Tuesday, 25 August 2009
Friday, 21 August 2009
Tuesday, 18 August 2009
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Re: Format name proposals
- Format name proposals
Friday, 14 August 2009
Thursday, 13 August 2009
- Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: Next step?
Wednesday, 12 August 2009
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- RE: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Re: Next step?
- Next step?
Monday, 10 August 2009
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- RE: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
Saturday, 8 August 2009
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- RE: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
Friday, 7 August 2009
- WebOTF Proposal: updated description and sample code
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- RE: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Re: Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Not replacing OTF/TTF linking
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- RE: EOTL font file specification version 1
- Re: RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1
- Re: EOTL font file specification version 1
- Fwd: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal
- Fwd: Re: [OpenFontLibrary] Fwd: www-font: WebOTF Proposal
- apologies and decision table
- RE: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
Thursday, 6 August 2009
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- RE: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- RE: WebOTF Proposal
- RE: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- WebOTF Proposal
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1
- RE: EOTL font file specification version 1
- RE: EOT-Lite testing for IE 6
- RFC: EOTL font file specification version 1
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- RE: Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available)
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
Wednesday, 5 August 2009
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available)
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Windows EOT name table limit (was: EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available)
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- EOT-Lite and ZOT Firefox test build available
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1 (and possibly v.1.2)
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: New file format names
- Re: New file format names
- Re: New file format names
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: New file format names
Tuesday, 4 August 2009
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: New file format names
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: New file format names
- Re: New file format names
- Re: New file format names
- Re: New file format names
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- New file format names
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- EOT-Lite File Format 1.2 (was RE: EOT & DMCA concerns)
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- [humor] Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: EOT & DMCA concerns
Monday, 3 August 2009
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- EOT & DMCA concerns
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: cutting to the chase
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: cutting to the chase
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Rumours of the death of "new, professionally designed typefaces" are perhaps exaggerated?
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- Re: Supporting EOT-Lite
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: cutting to the chase
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- cutting to the chase
Sunday, 2 August 2009
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
Saturday, 1 August 2009
- RE: Supporting EOT-Lite
- Font optimizer tool
- RE: Supporting EOT-Lite
- Re: Supporting EOT-Lite
- Re: Supporting EOT-Lite
- Supporting EOT-Lite
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
Friday, 31 July 2009
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- FW: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- Re: Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Font MIME type (was RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1)
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- EOT-Lite File Format v.1.1
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- IRC
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
Thursday, 30 July 2009
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- Re: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: EOT-Lite File Format
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: Another web font linking progress summary
- RE: Another web font linking progress summary
- Re: The unmentionable
- Another web font linking progress summary
- RE: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: Fonts and security
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: Fonts and security
- RE: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Fonts and security (was: The unmentionable)
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: format changes as false protection
- Re: The unmentionable
- Some history of font sharing
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- format changes as false protection
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable (was: "A way forward")
- RE: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts P.S.
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts
- .screenfonts (was: Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- RE: The unmentionable
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: The unmentionable
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- The unmentionable (was: "A way forward")
- EOT-Lite File Format
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
- RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: A way forward
- Re: CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- RE: CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)
- Re: A way forward
- RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: CFF and Uniscribe
- Re: EOT-Lite clarification
- CFF and Uniscribe (was: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite)
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
- RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: EOT-Lite clarification
- Re: A way forward
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
Monday, 27 July 2009
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: A way forward
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
- Re: Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
- Merits and deficiencies of EOT Lite (was: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata)
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- Re: EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- EOT-Lite clarification
- RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: A way forward
Sunday, 26 July 2009
- Re: A way forward
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata?
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- RE: Use What Is There -
- Re: Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
- Re: A way forward
- Combining ZOT with .webfont metadata
Saturday, 25 July 2009
- Re: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward)
- RE: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward)
- Re: A way forward
- Re: same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward)
- same-origin restrictions and EULA (Re: A way forward)
- Re: Weekend
- Re: The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly)
- Weekend
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
Friday, 24 July 2009
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward - I Propose An Active Adjournment For Assessment
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: Formats and Licensing
- Re: Formats and Licensing
- Formats and Licensing (Re: A way forward)
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- RE: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: Webfont compression
- RE: A way forward
- RE: Webfont compression
- RE: A way forward
- Re: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
Thursday, 23 July 2009
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly)
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- Re: A way forward
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: A way forward
- RE: A way forward (was: Webfont compression)
- RE: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- A way forward (was: Webfont compression)
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
Wednesday, 22 July 2009
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- The sad thing is, these things are all over the place... (silly)
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2.1
- Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2.1
- Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs
- Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs
- Re: Problems with style-linked EOTs
- .webfont Proposal 2.1
- Problems with style-linked EOTs
- Re: Webfont compression
Tuesday, 21 July 2009
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- RE: Webfont compression
- Re: Webfont compression
- Webfont compression
- Re: "Web fonts — where are we?"
- RE: "Web fonts - where are we?"
Monday, 20 July 2009
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: "Web fonts — where are we?"
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: "Web fonts — where are we?"
- "Web fonts — where are we?"
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
Sunday, 19 July 2009
Saturday, 18 July 2009
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
Friday, 17 July 2009
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .screenfonts
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- Re: .screenfonts
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .screenfonts [and optical sizes]
- .screenfonts
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
Thursday, 16 July 2009
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Support for Tal's webfont proposal on twitter, and Berlow's PERM table proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- RE: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
Wednesday, 15 July 2009
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion)
- .webfont Proposal 2
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- I expect all foundries to start offering web font licenses within 6 months.
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
Monday, 13 July 2009
Sunday, 12 July 2009
Friday, 10 July 2009
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
Thursday, 9 July 2009
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- the importance of fonts (silly)
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Web font linking progress summary
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Web font linking progress summary
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- CORS Access-Control-Allow-Origin "*" headers in Apache (Was Re: .webfont Proposal)
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
Wednesday, 8 July 2009
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- Re: .webfont Proposal
- .webfont Proposal
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: the truth which dare not speak it's name
- the truth which dare not speak it's name
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: progress on mutual understanding
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Questions re web-fonts
- Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: a basic question
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- RE: a basic question
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: Font license vs. conversion between font formats
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: a basic question
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- progress on mutual understanding
- Re: Partial fonts
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Partial fonts
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Partial fonts
- Re: a basic question
- Re: Partial fonts
Monday, 6 July 2009
- RE: Partial fonts
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: a basic question
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Partial fonts
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Partial fonts
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: a basic question
- Re: Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: a basic question
- a basic question
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Same-origin policies (Re: The other party in all this)
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Sunday, 5 July 2009
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Saturday, 4 July 2009
Friday, 3 July 2009
Sunday, 5 July 2009
Friday, 3 July 2009
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- The other party in all this
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Sunday, 5 July 2009
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Saturday, 4 July 2009
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- EOT Lite spec?
- Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion)
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Friday, 3 July 2009
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion)
- Re: hope for a way forward
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals - Sounds good to this DINOSAUR
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!]
- OT: max-width [Was: Re: EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!]
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals
- Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- EOT/TTF : Struggle for the life ?!
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Thursday, 2 July 2009
Friday, 3 July 2009
- Re: EOT and EOT-based proposals
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- EOT and EOT-based proposals
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
Thursday, 2 July 2009
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs
- RE: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- single-question poll - font vendors and browser devs
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- EOT Lite - possible outcomes
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: the discussion is over, resistance time
- the discussion is over, resistance time
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
Wednesday, 1 July 2009
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- compressed fonts: a proposed format
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- "wrapper format" (was: restarting discussion)
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: hope for a way forward
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback -- iNDIFFERENT OBSERVATION
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: hope for a way forward
- RE: hope for a way forward
- RE: hope for a way forward
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: hope for a way forward
- RE: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- RE: hope for a way forward
- Re: Fonts WG Charter feedback
- Re: hope for a way forward