W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-email-discuss@w3.org > March 1999

Re: [www-email-discuss] <none>

From: ONIME EHIMIKA OHIREIME <onime@ictp.trieste.it>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:27:53 +0100 (MET)
To: Orelbi Gonzalez <orelbigm@esivc.colombus.cu>
cc: www4mail-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.990324071957.28397U-100000@sv4>

Well, we don't support rsend or anything like it
because it is not easy to decide
1. Whose quota to update... it would be easy for someone to
	double or triple his quota using such a mechanism.
2. When the request is unsolicited, or when someone is trying to
	spam or use www4mail to force a webpage to a mailing list.
	How does the server know that your From: address is correct?
	Imagine using a fake From address to force www4mail to send
	the web page of your choice to a list with 2000 people.....

3. E-mail addresses are supposed to work both ways (sending & receiving)

Clement Onime

On Tue, 23 Mar 1999, Orelbi Gonzalez wrote:

> Spanish:  ?Porqué no incluir la posibilidad de dirigir los mensajes a otra
> cuenta a traves de Reply-To?  O quizas algo asi como rsend.
> Why you don't include the posibility of redirect the messages to another
> email address with Reply-To?  Or maybe something like rsend.
> Reply-To: orelbigm@esivc.colombus.cu
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 1999 01:34:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:20:54 UTC