- From: Rolf H. Nelson <rnelson@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 16:30:24 -0500
- To: onime@ictp.trieste.it
- CC: www4mail-comments@w3.org
What you describe sounds like a reasonable solution.
-Rolf
>>>>> "ONIME" == ONIME EHIMIKA OHIREIME <onime@ictp.trieste.it> writes:
> Rolf,
> Acutally we did consider such in the initial stages of
> developing www4mail. We were afraid that someone might
> delibrately or otherwise send about 2000 blank mails to www4mail
> (maybe with a wrong address) and then the server spends time and
> effort sending out 2000 error reports.
> Probably a solution would be that if a particular user makes
> over 20 syntax errors in a particular quota week, it might not
> be worth it processing his mails anymore for that quota period,
> in order words equate this condition to quota finished?
> Anyway, I await your idea(s) and input on this..
> Clement
--
| Rolf Nelson (rolf@w3.org), Project Manager, W3C at MIT
| "Try to learn something about everything
| and everything about something." --Huxley
Received on Thursday, 1 April 1999 16:30:29 UTC