- From: David Parrott <David.Parrott@reuters.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 14:54:13 +0100
- To: www-drm@w3.org
- Message-ID: <T5d74361911c407b7077bc@reuters.com>
The commentary at http://www.w3.org/Submission/2002/06/Comment discusses the limitation of "rights" languages with respect to expressing all possible exceptions. I have been interested in this subject for some time, prompted initially by talking to representatives of various societies for blind people in the context of eBook consumption. It struck me that expressing low-level definitions of permitted actions is where things start to go wrong. If I say that an eBook can only be consumed using a certain font, on a certain device, etc, etc, then the exception of allowing a text-to-speech conversion is ruled out. However, a publisher could not possibly think of all the exceptions. It is simply not scalable. Would it not be better to allow some form of trusted interpretation of a higher-level set of rules? Before people start shouting about complexity, I don't say this is an easy task, and it certainly requires a well thought-out trust framework. Using trusted interpretation that takes account of trusted context, one might even be able to tackle some of the "70 years after death" issues (a certificate from a trusted agency attesting to date of death might form part of the context of interpretation). Interpretation is not restricted to changing existing rules; it might introduce some new ones, based on well-defined meta rules. I attach a paper (Zip archive containing HTML + 5 images) that I don't think I've shared with this list before (I might have, if so, apologies), although it has been shared with MPEG and OeBF so some readers may have seen it. It explores some ideas around the above theme. Please view the ideas as examples, and not an attempt at a definitive answer. I'd be interested in responses. <<When is a Right not a Right.zip>> Best regards, /Dave Parrott _ ______________________________________________________________ Dr David J. Parrott (Chartered Engineer) Business Technology Group Reuters Limited, 85 Fleet Street, London EC4P 4AJ, UK. Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7542 9830, Fax: +44 (0)20 7542 8314 Email: David.Parrott@reuters.com, dparrott@acm.org ------------------------------------------------------------- --- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Attachments
- application/x-zip-compressed attachment: When is a Right not a Right.zip
Received on Friday, 20 September 2002 09:54:31 UTC